Pramod no, he said that was too bad because he tohught I'd make a great lawyer and would sponsor me for law school if need be. I was citing SCOTUS cases appropriate, knew some of the nuances of IDEA, knew state special ed regluations. I asked the district compliance officer directly if money was the one primary consideration in what they even consider providing the girls (noticing that their attorney became keenly interested when I used the term primary consideration'). His answer was yes . At which point she called for an immediate conference with her clients. They'd already admitted that they don't individualize IEPs and lied about the state/federal special ed funding. I had given the former legislator a heads up that they'd do that and he checked the information before coming into the meeting. Siily me, I'd tohught that, at some point, the girls' capabilitiesneeds and what lower district personnel/IEEs said was necessary might be important.